June 18 -Aug 8, 2010
The right-to-die debate rages on
Division and confusion felt in countries that lack clear and definitive legislation
By Francesco Veronesi

Originally Published: 2009-03-01

Assisted suicide, active and passive euthanasia, living wills, palliative treatment, bioethics, vegetative state, artificial nutrition. It is quite a complicated tangle to extricate oneself from such delicate, controversial themes that profoundly touch on the most personal emotions of the human soul.
All countries that in recent years have opened up a debate on these issues have experienced weighty domestic division characterized by controversy, debates, and accusations. And where they managed to establish norms, the wounds – both in political circles and in public opinion – have not healed. Freedom of choice, the safeguarding of life, rights of patients, and duty-bound treatment: From the judicial perspective there exists an excruciating difficulty in synthesizing the contrasting and strident elements into a homogenous legislative body. In countries still lacking legislation, the end-of-life issue continues to divide.

Defining Terminology

Euthanasia presents itself as the apparent solution for ending physical and emotional suffering of the patient, assuming obviously that the illness is terminal.
“Active euthanasia” refers to a doctor’s deliberate actions – for example, the administering of lethal drugs to cause death – in response to the explicit request of the patient.
“Passive euthanasia,” instead, refers to the suspension of treatment by the doctor – suspending nutrition, hydration, lung ventilation, or any number of other medical interventions designed to keep a terminally ill patient alive.
In this case, a distinction needs to be made. Passive euthanasia can also be consensual in cases where a patient has clearly and unequivocally expressed his or her wish to not undergo a particular surgical or pharmaceutical treatment, and nonconsensual, where a patient has not expressed his or her wishes and the decision to subsequently suspend treatment is made by the family. The Eluana Englaro case in Italy is a perfect example of this last point.

Page 1/...Page 2
Printable Version Email to a Friend Bookmark and ShareShare
Voice Your Opinion Letter to the Editor

Comments
CorriereTandem.com editors reserve the  right to edit, review and allow or reject, in their entirety, website comments. Those comments that are posted are not the opinions of Corriere Canadese/Tandem, or Multimedia Nova Corporation nor its affiliates but only of the writer. Spelling and grammar  errors will not be corrected. We will not allow comments that include personal attacks on citizens at large; comments that make false or unsubstantiated allegations; comments that claim to quote people or reports where the quote or fact is not publicly known;  or comments that include vulgar language or libelous statements.
Home / Back to Top
>> Special Series Archive
>> Contests / Promotions
>> Who We Are
>> Horoscope
>> Job opportunities
>> Advertising
>> Links
>> Search



Sign the online petition
   

Tandem Home | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2010 Multimedia Nova Corporation All Rights Reserved.